Latest Supreme Court Judgments

Latest Post

GeekUpd8 Doc Id # 707636
Manmohan Attavar Vs. Neelam Manmohan Attavar, (Supreme Court, Delhi)

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Rohinton Fali Nariman and Sanjay Kishan Kaul, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 2500 of 2017. D/d. 14.7.2017.

Manmohan Attavar - Appellants
Versus
Neelam Manmohan Attavar - Respondents

With Civil Appeal No. 2502 of 2017.

For the Appellants :- Anil Shetty, Balaji Srinivasan, Abhishek Bharati, Ms. Pratiksha Mishra, Ms. Vaishnavi Subramananyam, Arunava Mukherjee, Ms. Srishti Govil, Advocates.
For the Respondent :- Respondent-in-person.

JUDGMENT
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. - The appellant is 84 years old and the respondent is 62 years old. The respondent seeks to establish her status as the wife/companion of the appellant who has been left high and dry by the appellant while on the other hand the appellant categorically denies any such status.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Madan B. Lokur and Deepak Gupta, JJ.
Criminal Appeal No. 636 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7186 of 2014). D/d. 6.4.2017.

Dr. Sou Jayshree Ujwal Ingole - Appellants
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Anr. - Respondents

For the Appellants :- Shirish K. Deshpande, Mohit Gautam, Advocates.
For the Respondents :- Gagan Sanghi, Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
Deepak Gupta, J. - Leave granted.
2. The appellant herein is a doctor and has challenged the Order dated 18.06.2014 passed by the High Court of Judicature of Bombay, Nagpur Bench in Criminal Application (APL) No. 354 of 2012, whereby the petition filed by the appellant under Section 482 CrPC for quashing the criminal proceedings initiated against her under Section 304-A IPC was dismissed.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Dipak Misra, A.M. Khanwilkar and Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, JJ.
Conmt.Pet.(C) No. 374 of 2014 in Crl. A. No. 1834 of 2013. D/d. 25.4.2017.

Sita Ram - Petitioners
Versus
Balbir @ Bali - Respondents

For the Petitioners :- Rishi Malhotra, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- R. Balasubramanian, Nalin Kohli, Ms. Anindita Pujari, Ananya Mishra, Ms. Aarti Sharma, Advocates.
For the (State of Haryana) :- Davender Kumar Saini, AAG, Ms. Monika Gusain, Ms. Indu Malhotra, Sr. Adv., Gagan Gupta, Advocates.

ORDER
The present contempt petition was initiated under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (for brevity "the Act") on the ground that there had been violation of the judgment and order dated 24th October, 2013 passed by this Court in Criminal Appeal No.1834 of 2013.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Kurian Joseph and R. Banumathi, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 6450 of 2017 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 4385 of 2017). D/d. 9.5.2017.

Samir Vidyasagar Bhardwaj - Appellant
Versus
Nandita Samir Bhardwaj - Respondent

For the Appellant :- Ms. Vandana Sehgal, Advocate.
For the Respondents :- Udit Gupta, Ravi Kumar Tomar, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
R. Banumathi, J. - Leave granted.
2. An order passed by the High Court of Bombay in Writ Petition(C) No. 169 of 2017 dated 11.01.2017 wherein the High Court affirmed the interim order passed by the Family Court in and by which the appellant-husband has been directed to remove himself from his own home and not to visit there until the divorce petition is finally decided is under challenge.

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant and A.M. Khanwilkar, JJ.
Civil Appeal No. 6673 of 2014. D/d. 26.10.2016.

Satya Pal Anand - Appellant
Versus
State of M.P. & Ors. - Respondents

For the Appellant :- In-person.
For the Respondents :- C.D. Singh, Sandeepan Pathak, Mishra Saurabh, S.A. Desai, Ms. Anagha S. Desai, Advocates.

JUDGMENT
A.M. Khanwilkar, J. - This appeal has been placed before a three Judges' Bench in terms of order dated August 25, 2015, consequent to the difference of opinion between the two learned Judges of the Division Bench.
2. Justice Dipak Misra took the view that, in the fact situation of the present case the Writ Petition filed by the appellant challenging the order passed by the Sub-Registrar

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Before:- Ranjan Gogoi and N.V. Ramana, JJ.
Civil Appeal Nos. 10245 of 2014. D/d. 23.11.2016.

Relx India Pvt Ltd. and Anr. - Appellants
Versus
Eastern Book Company and Ors. - Respondents

ORDER
After hearing the learned counsels for the parties the appeal is disposed of with the following directions:

Puneet Batish Advocate

{facebook#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Adv.Batish} {twitter#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Twitter} {google-plus#http://g8.geekupd8.com/+pb} {pinterest#http://g8.geekupd8.com/Pinterest} {youtube#http://g8.geekupd8.com/YouTube}

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget